TV
- Future Shop
- /
- Home Theatre
- /
- TV
- /
- 60 vs. 120 hz televisions for regular television w...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watchin...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2011 12:26 PM
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watchin...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2011 12:51 PM
The difference between the two will only be seen when there are fast camera movements. Other than that, you will not see the difference.
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watchin...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
01-23-2011 01:03 PM
Each time the camera moves or shakes, I notice a ghost or blurr around edges on cheap tv's. Remember on HD, everything is 6 times more detailed.
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watchin...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-04-2011 08:07 PM
Question110578 wrote:
60 vs. 120 hz televisions for regular television watching including action movies
I have the same question. Does size matter? I was looking at the Samsung 46" LED 46C5000 which is 60Hz and the Sony CCFL 46EX500 at 120Hz. I've always been partial to Sony, but the Samsung blew me away. But I've only seen them display rather sedantary scenery. I'm not into fast sports, but I do enjoy a good fast paced movie. Anyone familiar with these two TV's?
Anyone know the Philips 46PFL5505 240Hz only $699... Why so cheap? Anygood?
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watching.. .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-06-2011 02:01 PM
Phillips is one of the best selling Televisions in Europe right now, the reason why there televisions are so cheap is because, A. There Future Shop exclusives so Future Shop asked for thoughs specs and prices to better suite the consumer and B. There trying to create a North American market for them selves in televisions. There giving Sony, Toshiba, LG, Sharp, and Panasonic a run for there money. Keep in mind that the 240hrtz is a fine motion enhancement not a true motion enhancement.
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watching.. .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-06-2011 02:02 PM
Regardless of that I would still buy one anyday ![]()
Re: 60 vs. 120 hz television s for regular television watchin...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
02-07-2011 06:14 AM
I agree with XL as well: take a look for yourself. I am sensitive to motion blur as well. If you are considering a LCD, 120 Hz is a must imho, especially in a larger TV, as there is more surface area thus the picture becomes more susceptable to blurring or judder. 120Hz will REDUCE motion blur but not eliminate it. 240Hz tends to render an artificial, soap opera, cartoonish look to the picture and to me, does not reduce the motion as much as 60Hz to 120Hz does.
Ultimately, if motion is a concern, buy a plasma: faster processing which means no judder or blur ( although some film does have anatural blur to it), better viewing angles, higher contrast and less expensive when comparing apples to apples.



