TV
- Future Shop
- /
- Home Theatre
- /
- TV
- /
- Gaming TV
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic to the Top
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page
Gaming TV
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-01-2010 03:42 PM - last edited on 03-01-2010 04:15 PM
Hi, I'm looking for a great gaming TV
what i'm looking for:
- 30 to 37 inch (preferably 32")
- 1080p
- your honest opinion
- $900 or less
If it means anything i play ps3.
Right now I am playing on this HD monitor. i have no complaints, it is great to game on, just looking for something a little bigger.
I was looking at this Sony TV and it looks like a good gaming TV since its 1080p with a 120 Hz refresh rate, but the Response time says "Not Applicable"... Why is that?
There's also a Sharp 32" 1080p LED HDTV at (competitor) selling for $999 I would buy that one but it seems a little expensive for a 32" TV. But if there are no LCD TVs that can somewhat match the specs I'll go with it.
Re: Gaming TV
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-02-2010
05:00 AM
- last edited on
03-17-2010
09:48 AM
by
JS
If you like it and you don't have any complains about it so you don't think of money. If a person like the thing he can pay any amount for that. So I advice you to buy it with that price.
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-13-2010 08:42 PM
The Sony model you have listed has the specs that are ideal for gaming. A high resolution and an upgraded refresh rate. I am not sure why they don't list it but I have had some customers that are very serious about having a fast response time, some of them gamers actually. Response time is basically the time it takes for the pixels to go from being inactive to active. For instance, how fast it takes to shift from black to white. A fast response time plays a role in fast motion along with refresh rate.Sony's generally use 8 milisecond response times in there TVs, so that would be my guess to the "Not Applicable" portion of your post. When a Sony rep came into my store at the Burlington location they began trying to prove that a normal person can't detect a difference between 4 to 8ms. My advice is to have a look at a Sony TV at a location and perhaps bring in a game trailer on a disc and test for yourself. I personally don't find that Sony's have that huge of a disadvantage based on there response times, their TV's look great to me.
For a gaming TV at 32'' here are a couple of my honest opinions:
-32'' the screen size is so small that the difference between 1080P and 720P is basically non-existant. The majority of video games on the market are run in 720P, some of them are even running 568p and being upscaled. You would have to look really closely to notice a slightly sharper image on a 32'' 1080P TV running Blu-Ray viewing at a regular viewing distance. The only reason where 1080P on a smaller screen will benefit someone is when you use it as a computer monitor, as you can fit more items on the screen (for example, you can see more columns on Microsoft Excel on a 1080P TV for somebody using it for business)
-A 120Hz refresh rate is definitely an advantage to gaming, as fast motion will appear smoother. Again, at this screen size I don't find it totally nesscesary but It is a great feature to have nonetheless.
I currently play my Xbox 360 on a Samsung B360 TV and I absolutely love it. That is a 720p 60Hz TV and I am extremely pleased with its performance. Ofcoarse, I was on a budget so I had to pick the best bang for the buck at the time, but take this into consideration. It is easier to reproduce an image on a smaller screen, so if I am happy with my 720p 60Hz TV playing A LOT of video games, you will be even more pleased with a 120Hz TV with full 1080p potential. If you have the coin I wouldn't hold back on going full 1080p with 120Hz, I just feel that is a bit overkill at that size. I found through my testing of the TVs at my location that 1080p really only made a noticeable difference 40'' and above. That is just my take on it. Ofcoarse others should give you their opinion, but I thought I would just share.
Basically, if you don't mind shelling out the extra cash, than that Sony TV should be perfect in complimenting your needs.
Hope my post was helpful. I'm sure whatever TV you choose you will be extremely happy with the end result! Take care.
Avneet - Burlington 070 - Home Theatre
________________________________
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-14-2010 11:40 AM
Brendan94 wrote:
Hi, I'm looking for a great gaming TV
what i'm looking for:
- 30 to 37 inch (preferably 32")
- 1080p
- your honest opinion
- $900 or less
If it means anything i play ps3.
keep in mind most ps3 games dont even run in 60fps, except for one or two like gran turismo. 120hz is not necessary, and no need to go over budget.
The advantage of 120hz panel is dejudder in blu-rays when combined with a good motion interpolation program like motion flow or auto motion plus.
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-19-2010 05:31 PM
seeAvneet wrote:The Sony model you have listed has the specs that are ideal for gaming. A high resolution and an upgraded refresh rate. I am not sure why they don't list it but I have had some customers that are very serious about having a fast response time, some of them gamers actually. Response time is basically the time it takes for the pixels to go from being inactive to active. For instance, how fast it takes to shift from black to white. A fast response time plays a role in fast motion along with refresh rate.Sony's generally use 8 milisecond response times in there TVs, so that would be my guess to the "Not Applicable" portion of your post. When a Sony rep came into my store at the Burlington location they began trying to prove that a normal person can't detect a difference between 4 to 8ms. My advice is to have a look at a Sony TV at a location and perhaps bring in a game trailer on a disc and test for yourself. I personally don't find that Sony's have that huge of a disadvantage based on there response times, their TV's look great to me.
For a gaming TV at 32'' here are a couple of my honest opinions:
-32'' the screen size is so small that the difference between 1080P and 720P is basically non-existant. The majority of video games on the market are run in 720P, some of them are even running 568p and being upscaled. You would have to look really closely to notice a slightly sharper image on a 32'' 1080P TV running Blu-Ray viewing at a regular viewing distance. The only reason where 1080P on a smaller screen will benefit someone is when you use it as a computer monitor, as you can fit more items on the screen (for example, you can see more columns on Microsoft Excel on a 1080P TV for somebody using it for business)
-A 120Hz refresh rate is definitely an advantage to gaming, as fast motion will appear smoother. Again, at this screen size I don't find it totally nesscesary but It is a great feature to have nonetheless.
I currently play my Xbox 360 on a Samsung B360 TV and I absolutely love it. That is a 720p 60Hz TV and I am extremely pleased with its performance. Ofcoarse, I was on a budget so I had to pick the best bang for the buck at the time, but take this into consideration. It is easier to reproduce an image on a smaller screen, so if I am happy with my 720p 60Hz TV playing A LOT of video games, you will be even more pleased with a 120Hz TV with full 1080p potential. If you have the coin I wouldn't hold back on going full 1080p with 120Hz, I just feel that is a bit overkill at that size. I found through my testing of the TVs at my location that 1080p really only made a noticeable difference 40'' and above. That is just my take on it. Ofcoarse others should give you their opinion, but I thought I would just share.
Basically, if you don't mind shelling out the extra cash, than that Sony TV should be perfect in complimenting your needs.
Hope my post was helpful. I'm sure whatever TV you choose you will be extremely happy with the end result! Take care.
I'm using a 21.5" LCD 1080p HD Monitor with HDMI input for my ps3 and im very happy with it. just looking to upsize a little bit. what you're saying is the 720p vs 1080p wouldn't make a significant difference as far as gaming goes... but a 720p sony is $549, the 1080p sony is $649 (these are 60hz, 8ms models) do you agree that its worth it to spend the extra $100 on 1080p even if it is only 32"?
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-19-2010 09:31 PM
Brendan94 wrote:
seeAvneet wrote:
The Sony model you have listed has the specs that are ideal for gaming. A high resolution and an upgraded refresh rate. I am not sure why they don't list it but I have had some customers that are very serious about having a fast response time, some of them gamers actually. Response time is basically the time it takes for the pixels to go from being inactive to active. For instance, how fast it takes to shift from black to white. A fast response time plays a role in fast motion along with refresh rate.Sony's generally use 8 milisecond response times in there TVs, so that would be my guess to the "Not Applicable" portion of your post. When a Sony rep came into my store at the Burlington location they began trying to prove that a normal person can't detect a difference between 4 to 8ms. My advice is to have a look at a Sony TV at a location and perhaps bring in a game trailer on a disc and test for yourself. I personally don't find that Sony's have that huge of a disadvantage based on there response times, their TV's look great to me.
For a gaming TV at 32'' here are a couple of my honest opinions:
-32'' the screen size is so small that the difference between 1080P and 720P is basically non-existant. The majority of video games on the market are run in 720P, some of them are even running 568p and being upscaled. You would have to look really closely to notice a slightly sharper image on a 32'' 1080P TV running Blu-Ray viewing at a regular viewing distance. The only reason where 1080P on a smaller screen will benefit someone is when you use it as a computer monitor, as you can fit more items on the screen (for example, you can see more columns on Microsoft Excel on a 1080P TV for somebody using it for business)
-A 120Hz refresh rate is definitely an advantage to gaming, as fast motion will appear smoother. Again, at this screen size I don't find it totally nesscesary but It is a great feature to have nonetheless.
I currently play my Xbox 360 on a Samsung B360 TV and I absolutely love it. That is a 720p 60Hz TV and I am extremely pleased with its performance. Ofcoarse, I was on a budget so I had to pick the best bang for the buck at the time, but take this into consideration. It is easier to reproduce an image on a smaller screen, so if I am happy with my 720p 60Hz TV playing A LOT of video games, you will be even more pleased with a 120Hz TV with full 1080p potential. If you have the coin I wouldn't hold back on going full 1080p with 120Hz, I just feel that is a bit overkill at that size. I found through my testing of the TVs at my location that 1080p really only made a noticeable difference 40'' and above. That is just my take on it. Ofcoarse others should give you their opinion, but I thought I would just share.
Basically, if you don't mind shelling out the extra cash, than that Sony TV should be perfect in complimenting your needs.
Hope my post was helpful. I'm sure whatever TV you choose you will be extremely happy with the end result! Take care.
I'm using a 21.5" LCD 1080p HD Monitor with HDMI input for my ps3 and im very happy with it. just looking to upsize a little bit. what you're saying is the 720p vs 1080p wouldn't make a significant difference as far as gaming goes... but a 720p sony is $549, the 1080p sony is $649 (these are 60hz, 8ms models) do you agree that its worth it to spend the extra $100 on 1080p even if it is only 32"?
unless you are a assasin sniper by night, you wont be able to tell the difference between 1080p and 720p on a 32". The exception is if you use it as a computer monitor, where the higher resolution would make a difference and would be evident. Of course if the price difference was say $0-$50, i would go for the increased resolution, as it would be nice to have in the off chance it might used with a computer.
Re: Gaming TV
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2010 02:57 PM - last edited on 03-23-2010 03:00 PM
so should i get this 40" instead since its the same price as the 1080p 120hz 32"?
or even
Sharp Aquos 40" 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV
which is on sale for $899
Re: Gaming TV
[ Edited ]- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2010 04:51 PM - last edited on 03-23-2010 04:57 PM
Instead of the sony, compare the sharp LC40E77U (that's the 120hz on sale you mentioned, right?) to the samsung LN40B550 (its one of the best value tvs around, great picture and price; well rated on cnet reviews). You can't go wrong with either one, so it would just come down to personal preference (appearance of bezel, picture) and circumstances (special offers and such). If you can, switch the tvs to their film/movie/cinema setting or mode and see which tv has the more realistic colours and blacks and more importantly which one can preserve the detail in those blacks (like shadows).
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2010 08:03 PM
Brendan94 wrote:
I'm using a 21.5" LCD 1080p HD Monitor with HDMI input for my ps3 and im very happy with it. just looking to upsize a little bit. what you're saying is the 720p vs 1080p wouldn't make a significant difference as far as gaming goes... but a 720p sony is $549, the 1080p sony is $649 (these are 60hz, 8ms models) do you agree that its worth it to spend the extra $100 on 1080p even if it is only 32"?
If it were me I would save the $100 and get the 720p, as I find it has a minimal difference on such a small size. But then again, I'm also brown and a complete cheap ass
If you don't mind shelling out the extra coin the 1080p has a bit more value with a better resolution, more HDMI inputs, USB input, etc. It basically just future proofs you for an extra 99 bucks and is overall the better TV.
Avneet - Burlington 070 - Home Theatre
---------------------------------------------------
Re: Gaming TV
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Highlight
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
03-23-2010 08:09 PM
Brendan94 wrote:
so should i get this 40" instead since its the same price as the 1080p 120hz 32"?
or even
Sharp Aquos 40" 1080p 120Hz LCD HDTV
which is on sale for $899
The Sharp E77 is a REALLY nice TV. I was really happy with the picture quality on it. That would be perfect for gaming with the bigger screen size and upgraded refresh rate. If I had to choose between the E77 and the Sony EX4 my pick would go with the Sharp. The Sony is basically the Sony S series from last year with a few gimmicky features (ambiant sensors) and just revamped as the 2010 model. If you can find the Sharp 40'' E77 at the price I would go for that.
Avneet - Burlington 070 - Home Theatre
---------------------------------------------------



