Future Shop
Weekly Flyer My Account My Account My Account

Tech Blog

Do I really have to use Microsoft Office?

by Blogger on 06-05-2009 10:26 PM - last edited on 04-30-2012 05:57 PM by Moderator

I think it's safe to say we all have a love-hate relationship with Microsoft and one fact is almost assured: like it or not Microsoft Office is something we all have to deal with. The question is though--do I have to use Microsoft Office? No ... and yes. Let's step into the world of office suites.

 

 For this post we're not talking about the place in a building where you have desks, chairs, and filing cabinets, we're talking word processors, spreadsheets, and presentation tools. The leading office suite is Microsoft's Office. MS Office, as we call it in polite company, is a set of applications designed to work together to do the common business and personal tasks we're all familiar with. Want to get your resume in order, fire up Word. Need to crank out a budget, Excel. Have to present your great idea to the Board, PowerPoint. These applications have become so common and synonymous with their tasks that saying "do you have your PowerPoint ready" really means "do you have your electronic presentation and slides ready". So if MS Office is every where, why is there any question, why don't we just all use it? Well first off, contrary to popular belief, MS Office isn't free. Yes, I know, shocking. MS Office doesn't come with Windows, sometimes you get its little brother MS Works when you buy a computer, but that's an add-on and still not included with Windows.

 

Okay, so it costs, no big deal right? Right, but here's the other thing, a lot of us loathe MS Office almost as much as Windows, and if you're using Linux, there isn't even a version of MS Office for you. Only Macs and PCs have MS Office versions available. The love-hate relationship with Office comes from the times with it misbehaves or you have to jump through some serious hoops to get something done. Then there is the fact that since everyone uses MS Office, well you have to as well.

 

Or do you?

 

There are several decent alternatives to MS Office, but here's the catch, they are all measured against not in how well they work, but how well they work with, you guessed it, MS Office. I'm going to go a few of my favourites here and give you my take on how well they stack up against each other and MS Office.

 

First out of the gate is the venerable OpenOffice. OpenOffice is a project sponsored by Sun Microsystems to create a free, open source, cross platform alternative to MS Office. OO runs on Macs, PCs, and Linux. There was a commercial version of it called Star Office, which I even bought a copy of back in the day, which has fallen by the wayside. OO has everything you need in an office suite, which the exception of an included email-contact-calendar applications (e.g. an alternative to MS Outlook). The word processor, spreadsheet, and presentation apps all look and work like you'd expect. They can open and save MS Office document formats.

 

So if OO is free, why hasn't it taken off like wildfire? Well beyond the Linux community where it is the only (real) choice, OO doesn't have the greatest track record for compatibility with MS Office. Sure, a simple document or spreadsheet might be fine, but much beyond that things can get go sideways fast. Before I start getting the pro-Open Office hate mail, I know that it is leaps and bounds better than it was. OpenOffice should be given real props for creating a real alternative to MS Office, still when you have to play nice with the giant in the sandbox, every little bit against you adds up fast.

 

Which brings me to the other tech behemoth: Google and Google Docs. When Google bought the online word processor Writely a few years ago, we knew that something big was going to be coming. A little while later Google Docs rolled out (Writely had already earned its place in the hearts and minds of the tech set), we knew that we had a worthy online word processor that also let us share the documents, then also open them in Word. Since Google Docs launched we now have spreadsheets and presentations in the mix. All of these are fantastic pieces of work. Useable, sharable, easy. Online.

 

And really only online. Yes, with Google Gears you can have offline documents, but not really in the way you'd hope. like having a complete word processor in a browser whenever you wanted.

 

Again, the ugly head of compatibility with MS Office rises up from the gloom. Like OpenOffice, Google Docs and Spreadsheets is good, but not perfect. Because Google Docs converts Word documents into HTML, it isn't hard for things to get wonky. Working with images and charts in Google Docs is better left to either the eternally patient or already insane.

 

I use Google Docs a lot, even with those flaws, because I can share a document because Macs, PCs, and even Ubuntu and know that it will be the same for each of them. I know that the document can be exported to a local drive in a myriad ways. I also know that it can't completely replace an office suite like MS Office or OpenOffice. The limitations of working within a web browser are just too great to allow for the word processing, etc functions we're used to having at our fingertips.

 

For us in the Mac set you might be tempted with iWork. I was when I got my Mac. I downloaded the trial and started using it with glee.

 

Sorta.

 

I wasn't enamoured with Pages (word processing) or Keynote (presentations). Numbers was fine (I don't do a lot of spreadsheet work), but not stellar. What was the reall kicker was iWork really, really wants you to stick to its file formats. Uh huh, great, except for the fact that many of us are constantly exchanging files with people using MS Office. In iWork you need to export the files for every change, then re-open the new doc and save as pages, etc. There isn't a "always open and save as Word" opition. Even MS Word 2007 or 2008 allows you to set the default format to be Office 2003 .doc instead of .docx.

 

That was it for me. I knew that eventhough I tried. Eventhough there are great features in iWork, OpenOffice, and Google Docs, none of them are 100% compatible with MS Office. The time spent fixing a presentation or document just because one memeber of the team want to buck the trend and be different adds up fast. Believe me it didn't take long for the people I was working with to demand I stop using Star Office and get myself back on MS Office when every time I edited and saved a presentation it took someone an hour to fix all the formatting that was wrecked.

 

Which is why I bit the bullet and bought MS Office for Mac 2008 before my 30 day trial of iWork was even half over.

 

So in the end, no you don't have to use or buy MS Office, there are great alternatives, however if you exchange a lot of documents with other people using MS Office, you might find yourself fixing a lot of documents. 

Message Edited by MikeLee on 07-28-2009 07:44 PM
Message Edited by Laura on 08-21-2009 05:01 PM

Comments
by Exalted Expert Exalted Expert on 06-05-2009 10:38 PM

Don't forget that Microsoft has released some free Viewer tools. Word Viewer, Excel Viewer, and PowerPoint Viewer will let you open and look over (and print out) those respective file formats, in an Office program, for free. It wouldn't be too much trouble to use OpenOffice for creating and editing documents you've made, and the Viewers to view and print files your colleagues have made.

 

Though, that still leaves editing files others have made... Yep, while OpenOffice is decent, it isn't perfect.

by Exalted Expert Exalted Expert on 06-05-2009 10:40 PM
Whoops, meant to add a link. The viewers can be downloaded from here.
by Blogger on 06-05-2009 10:41 PM

@Tanarus and it's the editing that always gets you. That first "what the .... did you do to the presentation!?!" is enough to bring you back to MS Office.

 

I've tried many times to shed it completely, but I always come back to MS Office. 

by Blogger on 06-05-2009 10:43 PM
@Tanarus thanks for the link. One Office alternative that might be worth a try is ThinkFree. I used it a ton a couple years ago. PC-Mac-Linux (it's Java) + web all very, very compatible with MSFT. There is even a mobile version. They had some stumbles in the past, I think maybe with it were a little cheaper ThinkFree might have a real chance.
by Exalted Expert / Community Ambassador on 06-06-2009 01:08 AM

Great blog!  I'd always used Microsoft Works for the longest time.  For my Word processing needs at the time, it was just fine.  I also tried using another office suite (what was it called??? Started with a "C"), but didn't care for it and hated that no one could open the files.  But then I started at a job at a company where I had to use Office 2000.  And we finally started having to prepare presentations for classes (technology had finally advanced to that point :smileytongue:).  After that, I was hooked and I found myself a copy of Office 2003.

 

When Office 2007 came out, I was skeptical.  Waited a while, then finally tried it.  Hated it the first day.  Didn't hate it so much the second day, and by the end of the week, I was in love with it.  There are just so many things you can do with it when you learn how to actually use it.  I know a Mac user friend who swears by Keynote for creating presentations, and for him, it's perfect, but I just can't beat PowerPoint on my PC.  And I can do nearly all the statistical analysis I need using Excel.  And what I can't do in Excel, I organize in Excel and then just copy and paste over to my statistical package.  So much easier to work with.

 

I've considered trying other newer office suites like OpenOffice, but realistically, when you have Microsoft Office, there really is no need!  And now with Office Live, if you have things set up correctly at work, you can log in anywhere and work on your projects.  How handy is that!  While I'm not personally using it, my boyfriend is for work and it's great.  He can now work from home whenever he needs to and he doesn't actually need Office to be installed on the computer he's on.

 

Anyhow, very interesting perspectives @trishussey, and I'm in full agreement.  If you don't have extensive needs, something like Open Office is a great free alternative, but you really can't beat Microsoft Office when it comes down to doing real work.  :smileyhappy:

by Blogger on 06-06-2009 06:50 AM

@Krypto that's exactly how MS Office creeps into your world. The "have to use it for work" path. Bucking the trend at work is just not a bright idea.

 

I would say that you can do real work using OO or iWork, however sharing that work with others might prove a little difficult.

 

I too tried Office 2007 pretty quickly. I liked it from the start though. And in a bright move by MSFT, you can tell it to always save in the older 2003 formats, rather than the newer ones. 

by tachyondecay on 06-06-2009 09:03 AM

I do my part to convert friends to OpenOffice.org (mostly students who complain, "I have to spend so much money to get Office when I buy my new laptop!").

 

While I acknowlege that this may not be practical in every situation, whenever I get a document I can't open in OpenOffice.org (usually the infamous .docx), I send an email back to the originator of the document and patiently explain why I need it sent as a .doc.

 

Also, perhaps I've just been incredibly lucky, but I've yet to run into any major compabitiliby problems.  Maybe I just don't use OpenOffice.org for doing crazy things to my documents and spreadsheets.  What most impresses me so far is the compability of the comments/notes and change tracking features.  I love those guys!  And they're much improved in OpenOffice.org 3.1 now.  I do lots of fancy things with them, and they always seem compatible with their counterpart versions in MS Office.

 

While we're on the subject of "alternate" software, I have to throw out FoxIt Reader as an alternative to reading PDFs.  I haven't purchased the PDF-creation part of the program, but it's a very robust PDF reader without the bloat of Adobe Reader.   Just saying....

by Blogger on 06-06-2009 12:04 PM

@tachyondecay I agree, OpenOffice has improved by leaps and bounds since when I first used it. Yes, matching up the track changes is great and I think that they just added docx, etc importing now.

 

I also agree with your choice of Foxit Reader. Doesn't bog down your browser etc like Acrobat does. 

by Trusted Expert / Community Ambassador on 06-10-2009 07:12 AM
Another alternative you can take a look at is IBM Lotus Symphony.  It's based on openoffice.org and it's free (although not open source).  You can download it here.
by Blogger on 06-10-2009 07:22 AM
@mtrump Thanks for the tip. I had forgotten about those other players.
by Blogger on 06-11-2009 08:50 AM

I think it's rather cool that all these Office productivity suites are still thriving. Not everyone's needs are the same...so what I use at work (MSO 2003) would be total overkill for my Mom (Google Apps/ MSWorks).

 

Now, if they could just get the compatibility issues worked out...:smileyhappy: