Future Shop
Weekly Flyer My Account My Account My Account

Tech Blog

With first generation tech, is it better to wait?

by Blogger on 03-29-2010 08:45 PM - last edited on 04-30-2012 11:52 AM by Moderator

nytipad.jpgLater this week the much ballyhooed (yes, I've been wanting to use that word in a post for a long time!) Apple iPad will make an appearance in the hands of an 'Early Adopter' near you.

And, after taking a look at the cool new tech, you may consider acquiring one of your own.

But there are two schools of thought on being an Early Adopter when it comes to tech.

Jump in and reap the benefits of being on the bleeding edge
The biggest point in favour of grabbing that shiny new tech the moment it's available is that you have a head start over everyone else.

First off, by getting in now, you've had ample time to learn and benefit (through entertainment, experience, productivity boost, whatever) from your new acquisition. Everyone else has been watching you enviously, and slipping behind.

If you're a software developer, that means you can test and develop your code 'on the hardware'. If you're a consultant recommending tech to clients, you can determine the pros and cons of the platform that much easier!

Which leads us to one of the key challenges of being an early adopter; in some ways, you're a beta tester for the rest of us. Early adopters get to discover flaws and problems in the hardware and software that the manufacturer missed. For some folks that's a minor concern, for others, it's a deal breaker. Which leads us to the next school of thought.

Wait, and reap the benefits of lessons learned
As I mentioned above, there's a lot that the Early Adopters do that the laggards can easily benefit from. These things only get better with time, so odds are that by waiting one development cycle, if you're not in the group that *needs* that new shiny, then perhaps monitoring the unit's development for a bit is in your best interest.

Flawed hardware design can be fixed. Software will be patched. New features could be added.

Yes, there is a lot to be said for waiting, likewise, there's much to be said for jumping right in.

Where do you sit?

Comments
by Blogger on 03-29-2010 09:31 PM
Gimme! Gimme now! Oh wait was that out loud? In seriousness, I see a lot of benefits to getting one now vs later. However since the chances of that actually happening are slim, I'll probably get the next gen.
by InKneeSocks on 03-29-2010 10:29 PM

While I definitely want to have one of everything I tend to lean towards the needing to test the new gadget soon after its release to consider purchase but I would never pre-order unless I had never held an example of one in my own two hands. But exceptions will be made, but not for the iPad. I am dreaming of the Microsoft Courier...

by Exalted Expert / Community Ambassador on 03-29-2010 10:33 PM

I used to be one to want to wait and go for things after I knew they were durable, but who am I kidding... if I can afford it and if I want it bad enough, I like to be the first in line (so to speak - you won't actually find me at the front of any line waiting).  I was the first person to get the original BlackBerry Storm in the store on the first day it was released.  And I fully intend (at this point in time anyhow) to go for the HP Slate as soon as it gets released.

 

But generally speaking, as a consumer, you really are better off not jumping on the bandwagon too quickly.  And for the exact reasons posted above.  Unless you are willing to deal with glitches, etc., it really is often best to wait at least a little while.

by Varun(anon) on 03-30-2010 12:45 AM

I was one of the early users of the iPhone and then the iPhone 3GS - because I could immediately see how the iPhone was far better than anything I'd used till then and because the 3GS came with a substantial speed boost, making it far more usable.


With the iPad, the gadget-lover in me wants one. But the pragmatist in me keeps asking "all well and good, but what will you DO with it???"


For the moment, the pragmatist is winning.


- Varun.

by Exalted Expert / Community Ambassador on 03-30-2010 09:09 AM

Delaying gratification and resisting temptations is a proven way to be successful.

 

http://www.ted.com/talks/joachim_de_posada_says_don_t_eat_the_marshmallow_yet.html

by Blogger on 03-30-2010 09:09 AM

Heh, looks like we've all got some 'gotta have it when it's new' stories...and have learned some lessons by getting the tech before the bugs were worked out.  Nice to find a happy medium.

by tachyondecay on 03-30-2010 10:56 AM

Sometimes technology that appears first-generation is still very mature, enough so that it's safe to adopt it early.

 

I am really lusting after the Kobo eReader right now.

 

Interestingly enough, it appears that the Kobo eReader's hardware is just a rebranded, somewhat old model eReader.  So from an "early adoption" standpoint, this isn't really early adoption, since the hardware is already tried and tested (and software is easier to fix with updates).  The only caveat is that Kobo says that this is just the first in its line of eReaders, so maybe a newer one will come out down the line with more bells and whistles and a tactical nuke.

 

Not that I need a tactical nuke for anything. . . .

 

So do I get a Kobo eReader now, knowing that it does exactly what I need it to do?  Or do I wait, rather certain that in a few months or a year a newer, shinier, "better" eReader will come along to break my heart all over again?

 

All things being equal, I think I'd get an eReader now.  It's about time I get one.  All things aren't equal though, and I'm still not going to buy eBooks with DRM on them, so I would only be using the eReader for public domain or the few non-DRM eBooks that I'd want to read.  That essentially eliminates the usefulness of the eReader to me.  Looks like I'll be waiting (maybe for a long, long time).  But I digress.  This isn't an anti-DRM rant. . . .

 

More important than problems with the first generation devices--as you pointed out, most of these can be fixed, especially if they're software-related--is the siren call of newer models.  I don't see early adoption as, "If I get this, can I be reasonably certain I'll be able to use it without it breaking?" so much as, "If I get this, will I still be happy with it when next year's model comes out with a tactical nuke and genetically-modified shark soldier accessory that is Bluetooth-2.1 compatible?"

by Trusted Expert / Community Ambassador on 03-31-2010 02:41 AM

I'm normally one to wait, at least with technology.  I've never owned a top-of-the-line computer, though that's mostly due to financial issues.  I waited for an XBox 360, and even longer for a PS3.  It came with a benefit though - I got the 60GB Jasper chip XBox 360 Pro as opposed to the earlier, more prone to RROD 20GB Pro.  I ended up with a slim PS3, as opposed to the fat one - and after actually having the slim and using it, I much prefer it to the fat version (my sisters-in-law have a fat one, so I have used one).  I'm glad I waited.

 

For gaming, I usually jump right in, and am willing to shell out the extra money for game add-ons, as opposed to waiting and then buying a Game of the Year edition or Greatest/Platinum Hits version.

 

Normally for me, I can't afford to get new technology right away, as the first-gen stuff tends to be the most expensive version.  Maybe if I win the lottery I will get the first and best of everything as it hits the market, but until my wallet becomes so heavy I can't walk, patience is my virtue for technology :smileyhappy:

 

JB 

by InKneeSocks on 05-30-2011 06:10 PM

lol - over a year later and read my comment about not wanting an iPad and wanting the Courier... now the Courier is no more and I own an iPad.

by Exalted Expert / Community Ambassador on 05-30-2011 08:27 PM
It's actually rather amusing... I wanted the HP Slate and now I've gone for a BlackBerry PlayBook instead. And I love it. Amazing how times change.